Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Split big sitemaps & generate proper index (closes #79, #106) #128

Draft
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

stefandoorn
Copy link
Owner

  • Split big sitemaps based on a configurable limit (defaults to 50.000)
  • Use the amount of files in generation of the URIs to these files (and use them in the index)

@stefandoorn stefandoorn requested a review from loevgaard August 24, 2020 12:38
@stefandoorn stefandoorn self-assigned this Aug 24, 2020
@stefandoorn
Copy link
Owner Author

@loevgaard I started working on this. I'm not very happy yet with the implementation. For sure the command does too much, but that's a refactor for later. The sending around of the amount of paths to the index provider should be more elegant, but couldn't come up with a better implementation right now.

@stefandoorn stefandoorn marked this pull request as draft August 24, 2020 12:40
@stefandoorn stefandoorn changed the title WIP: Split big sitemaps & generate proper index (closes #79, #106) Split big sitemaps & generate proper index (closes #79, #106) Aug 24, 2020
@next-sentence
Copy link

any estimation when it will be merged?

1 similar comment
@bmehdi
Copy link

bmehdi commented Jul 7, 2022

any estimation when it will be merged?

@stefandoorn
Copy link
Owner Author

Ah, haven't looked into it anymore. Have you maybe been able to test it in a real project? Would be great to have some feedback on the implementation.

LucaGallinari added a commit to webgriffe/sitemap-plugin that referenced this pull request Sep 20, 2023
LucaGallinari added a commit to webgriffe/sitemap-plugin that referenced this pull request Sep 20, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants